The Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC) of Colombia, as National Authority for Personal Data Protection, imposed a sanction of $128.973 USD to the Colombian multinational company ‘RAPPI’, for repeated violations of the personal data protection regime, specifically, for not giving a timely response to multiple requests from users to delete their personal data, or failing to present their prior authorization for using their personal information.
The Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC) of Colombia, as National Authority for Competition Protection, opened an investigation against one company (AVINCO) and three individuals for alleged infractions to the competition protection regime, due to evidence of misconduct in contractual selection processes carried out by the Colombian National Institute of Highways (INVIAS) and the National Tourism Fund (FONTUR).
The Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC) of Colombia, as National Authority for Personal Data Protection, imposed a sanction of $245.000 USD to the telecommunications company CLARO COLOMBIA, for making use of a data portability database (where all cell phone numbers in Colombia are registered), with the goal of making massive marketing campaigns and attract new users.
La Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio presenta a los doce nominados de la decimoprimer Versión del Premio Nacional al Inventor Colombiano que, durante este año, recibió la postulación de 131 proyectos, demostrando el nivel de inventiva de los colombianos desde las diferentes ciudades y regiones del país.
Bogotá D.C., 10 de noviembre de 2021. La Superintendencia de Industria y Comercio, en su rol de autoridad nacional de competencia, formuló pliego de cargos contra YUMBO LIMPIO S.A.S.
By ruling of September 16, 2021, the Deputy Superintendence for Jurisdictional Affairs of the Superintendence of Industry and Commerce (SIC) of Colombia resolved the lawsuit against SETEYCO, INVERSIONES CAFI and ACCIÓN SOCIEDAD FIDUCIARIA, after it was demonstrated that those companies did not deliver the promised real estate to the consumers, nor did they deliver the signature of the property deed within 5 years, thus violating the consumer protection regimen regarding legal guarantees, information and contractual protection.
